Mary, Queen of Scots and Cryptoanalysis

Military History

Mary, Queen of Scots and Cryptoanalysis

Mary, Queen of Scots was let down by a faulty cipher and her misplaced trust in the reputed cleverness of her co-conspirators.

Mary, Queen of Scots was let down by a faulty cipher and her misplaced trust in the reputed cleverness of her co-conspirators.

by David Allan Johnson

Mention Elizabethan England to most people, and they usually think of William Shakespeare, the Globe Theatre and Sir Francis Drake. Codes, spies and cryptanalysts are probably the last things to come to mind. But besides poets, playwrights, and sea dogs, the reign of Elizabeth I also produced Britain’s first master spy, as well as its first state-sanctioned spy school.

The Battle of Waterloo

Gain new insight into the battle that brought the end of Napoleon’s rule in France.
Get your copy of Warfare History Network’s FREE Special Report,
The Battle of Waterloo


Sir Francis Walsingham was secretary of state to Elizabeth, as well as one of her most ruthless ministers. Usually described as Machiavellian, he was absolutely singleminded when it came to the security of the Queen and her realm. He recruited over 50 agents on the European continent (mostly in Flanders and France, but some as far away as Constantinople, Algiers, and Tripoli), along with several working spies in England, and established a “cipher school” in London. In 1586, Walsingham discovered that a plot against Elizabeth had been formed by supporters of Mary Stuart, Queen of Scots, and set out to use his own spies to destroy it.

As his cryptanalyst, or “cypher secretary,” Walsingham employed Thomas Phelippes, who would become England’s first expert code breaker.

Mary’s “Cypher Secretary”

As his cryptanalyst, or “cypher secretary,” Walsingham employed Thomas Phelippes, who would become England’s first expert code breaker. The newly developed post of cryptanalyst was a combination of mathematician, linguist, and puzzle fiend, in about equal proportions. This description certainly fit Phelippes. He could speak French, Italian, Latin, and German, and he also had a working grasp of Spanish, although he was not fluent in it. More important, Phelippes was able to break codes in each of these languages. He seemed genuinely to enjoy tinkering with codes, and ciphers were a sort of game to him.

The only existing physical description of Phelippes is from Mary, Queen of Scots, who wrote rather unflatteringly that he was “of low stature, slender in every way, dark yellow haired on the head, and clear yellow bearded, eated in the face with small pocks, of short sight, thirty years of age in appearance.” By 1586, Mary was understandably prejudiced against all things English and against Phelippes in particular. She had been in England since 1568, when she was forced to leave Scotland after her own troops had been routed by the army of her half-brother. Although she retained the title Queen of Scots, Mary could not go back to Scotland. Her cousin Elizabeth kept her under close watch, although not under actual arrest, and had her moved between various castles and stately homes for the next 18 years.

Chief Instigator or Rightful Heir?

As far as Walsingham was concerned, Mary was the chief instigator of the plot to depose Elizabeth and put the crown on her own head. On at least two prior occasions, Catholic factions in England had plotted to replace Elizabeth with Mary and return England to the Roman Church. A good many Catholics regarded Mary as the rightful queen of England and Elizabeth as merely a Protestant usurper. Walsingham always suspected that Mary was at the root of these conspiracies, but he had no concrete proof on which to base his charges. During the summer of 1586, however, his direst suspicions were confirmed.

In January 1586, Mary was confined to Chartley Hall in Staffordshire. Previously, she had lived under the guardianship of George Talbot, Earl of Shrewsbury, who had allowed her a large degree of personal freedom. Walsingham, already suspicious of the deposed sovereign, had Mary placed under the control of Sir Amyas Paulet, a man of strict Puritan principles like Walsingham himself. Paulet was instructed to monitor closely Mary’s personal retinue. No strangers were to be admitted for any reason, and special attention was paid to the comings and goings of servants such as laundresses and coachmen, whom Walsingham suspected of carrying secret messages to and from the Scottish monarch.

Organizing a New Plot

Walsingham’s tightened security soon paid off. A 24-year-old former page of Mary’s, Anthony Babington, had organized a new plot to release Mary, assassinate Elizabeth, and make Mary queen. Walsingham’s tightened security soon paid off. A 24-year-old former page of Mary’s, Anthony Babington, had organized a new plot to release Mary, assassinate Elizabeth, and make Mary queen. Babington and his fellow conspirators realized that their plan had no hope of succeeding without the consent and participation of Mary herself. The problem for Babington was how to communicate with Mary inside Chartley Hall, where her every move was closely monitored and observed by Paulet and his staff.

To serve as a messenger between himself and Mary, Babington recruited a Catholic named Gilbert Gifford. Gifford seemed an ideal candidate: he had been trained as a priest and was well known to Mary, having been one of her courtiers. In July 1586, to prove his usefulness and his loyalty to Mary, he delivered a letter from her to Babington, in which she reported that she had heard of Babington through her supporters in Paris, and looked forward to hearing from him. Babington was exhilarated by Mary’s letter and immediately drafted a reply: “Myself with ten gentlemen and a hundred of our followers will undertake the delivery of your royal person from the hands of your enemies,” he wrote. “For the dispatch of the usurper, from the obedience of whom we are by the excommunication of her made free, there be six noble gentlemen, all my private friends, who for the zeal they bear to the Catholic cause and your Majesty’s service will undertake that tragical execution.” The excommunication mentioned was of Elizabeth by Pius V in 1570, which, in Babington’s mind, released him and his followers from obeying the “usurper.”

This article is from the August 2005 issue of Military Heritage Magazine. If you would like to read the rest of this and other articles, visit our order page to see which digital editions we have on offer.

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *



Issue Previews

How Juan Pujol Garcia (a.k.a. “Garbo”) Made The D-Day Invasion Happen

How Juan Pujol Garcia (a.k.a. “Garbo”) Made The D-Day Invasion Happen

Double Agent Juan Pujol Garcia—a.k.a. ‘Garbo’—helped the Allies mislead the Germans as to the actual D-Day invasion landing site.

Union General John T. Croxton’s Southern Odyssey

Union General John T. Croxton’s Southern Odyssey

After being separated from Wilson’s corps, Union General John T. Croxton embarked on a 31-day odyssey spanning 653 miles, crossing four major rivers.

A Hard Mutt’s Life: “Military Dogs” in World War II

A Hard Mutt’s Life: “Military Dogs” in World War II

Below, the fox terrier ‘Salvo’ prepares for a drop over England. Military dogs played a key role in morale and companionship throughout the war.

A Wehrmacht Pioneer Laid to Rest 70 Years After Operation Barbarossa

A Wehrmacht Pioneer Laid to Rest 70 Years After Operation Barbarossa

Thanks to technological advances and local help, a Wehrmacht Pioneer was finally located and laid to rest years after Operation Barbarossa.

facebook gplus twitter youtube rss

Enter Your Log In Credentials

Forgot your Password?

×
.